Solution

Take a look at triangle \(OPQ\) in this diagram. Explain why \(P\) has the coordinates given.

A pair of axis with right-angled triangle OPQ. Where the coordinates of P are (0.5,root 3 divided by 2), the angle opposite point P is pi divided by 3 and the hypotenuse length is 1

Imagine we move \(P\) by increasing \(\angle QOP\), whilst keeping \(PQ\) perpendicular to the \(x\)-axis. How could \(P\) move if

  1. the length of \(OP\) is fixed but \(Q\) can move along the \(x\)-axis as required?

  2. \(Q\) remains fixed but the length of \(OP\) can change?

In each case, can you express the coordinates of \(P\) in terms of \(\angle QOP\) ?

If the length of \(OP\) is fixed but \(Q\) can move along the \(x\)-axis, then as \(\angle QOP\) increases, \(P\) moves anticlockwise, tracing out an arc of a circle of radius \(1\), centre \((0,0).\)

If we write \(\angle QOP=t\) then the locus of \(P\) has parametric equations \[x=\cos t \quad \text{and}\quad y=\sin t\] What could the domain of \(t\) be in this case?

A pair of axis with the hypotenuse of the triangle drawn on. Point P at the top of the line is moved in an anti-clockwise direction creating a sector with a centre at the origin and a radius of 1

Note that we’ve shown the path that \(P\) traces out as \(\angle QOP\) increases to slightly less than \(\pi.\) What value will \(\angle QOP\) need to reach for \(P\) to move round a full circle?

If the length of \(OP\) can change but \(Q\) remains fixed at \(\left(\tfrac{1}{2},0\right)\), then \(P\) will move up the line \(x=\tfrac{1}{2}\) from the point \(\left(\tfrac{1}{2}, \tfrac{\sqrt{3}}{2}\right)\) as \(\angle QOP\) increases.

If we write \(\angle QOP = t\) then can you explain why the locus of \(P\) has these parametric equations?

\[x=\tfrac{1}{2}\quad \text{and}\quad y=\tfrac{1}{2}\tan t\]

An additional triangle is added to the original where length of OP has been extended but the length of OQ has remained the same. The coordinates of Q have also been added on as (0.5,0)

Approximately what range of values of \(t\) do you think would give the line segment shown?

What range of values for \(t\) would give us the whole line \(x=\tfrac{1}{2}\)?

Now try this

Sketch the curves or lines defined by the following parametric equations. Mark on your sketch any key values of \(t\) and the direction in which the curve is traced out as \(t\) increases.

  1. \(x=2t\) and \(y=3t-1\) for \(t\in \mathbb{R}.\)

  2. \(x=t^3\) and \(y=t^2\) for \(-2\leq t\leq 2.\)

  3. \(x=3\sin t\) and \(y=3\cos t\) for \(0< t< \pi.\)

For each curve, find a Cartesian equation (an equation that only involves \(x\) and \(y\)).

Although you may be able to find a Cartesian equation very easily, it is worth trying to sketch using the parametric equations as this may help with more complicated examples.

Both \(x\) and \(y\) vary linearly with \(t\), so we might expect a straight-line graph. What else do we need to know?

As \(t\) increases, both \(x\) and \(y\) increase because they both have a positive coefficient for \(t.\) What does this tell us about the direction in which the line is traced out as \(t\) increases?

We can now think about some important points. For example, when \(t=0\) then \(x=0\) and \(y=-1.\) What is \(t\) when \(y=0\)?

Finally, note that \(y\) increases at \(\frac{3}{2}\) times the rate at which \(x\) increases.

a linear graph intersecting the y-axis at -1 (where t=0) and the x-axis at 2/3 (where t=1/3) tracing from left to right as t increases

By eliminating \(t\) from the two equations, we can obtain Cartesian equations, such as \(y=\frac{3}{2}x-1\) or \(3x-2y-2=0.\)

Note that when \(t=0\), \(x=0\) and \(y=0\) so the curve passes through the origin.

When \(t\) is negative and increasing \(x\) is negative and increasing and \(y\) is positive but decreasing. When \(t\) is positive and increasing both \(x\) and \(y\) are positive and increasing. Thus the graph is traced out from left to right and \(y\geq 0.\)

Note too that replacing \(t\) with \(-t\) gives the same value of \(y\). What effect does it have on \(x\)? What does this tell us about the curve?

Thinking about how rapidly \(x\) and \(y\) change as \(t\) increases, note that \(\frac{dy}{dt}\) is linear, but \(\frac{dx}{dt}\) is quadratic. Therefore as \(t\) increases from \(0\), \(x\) increases progressively faster compared to \(y.\) What about when \(t\) is negative but increasing?

A graph showing a cusp starting from point (-8,4) when t=-2 dipping to the origin and symmetrically rising to (8,4) when t=2 through the point (1,1) when t=1

Finally we can substitute for \(t\) to obtain the Cartesian equation \(y^3=x^2\) or \(y=x^{\frac{2}{3}}\), where \(-8\leq x\leq 8\).

Again, let’s start by thinking how \(x\) and \(y\) vary with \(t.\)

As \(t\) increases from \(0\) to \(\pi\) we use our knowledge of trigonometric functions to note that \(x\) increases from \(0\) to \(3\) and back again (with \(x=3\) when \(t=\frac{\pi}{2}\)). The value of \(x\) changes most quickly when \(t\) is close to \(0\) or \(\pi.\)

As \(t\) increases from \(0\) to \(\pi\), \(y\) decreases from \(3\) to \(-3.\) When \(t=\frac{\pi}{2}\), \(y=0\) and \(y\) is changing most rapidly.

A graph showing a semicircle starting from point (0,3) when t=0 cutting the x axis at (3,0) when t = half pi and approaching point (0,-3) as t approaches pi (end points not included)

The sketch suggests that the curve could be the part of the circle with Cartesian equation \(x^2+y^2=9\) for which \(0< x \leq 3\) and \(-3 < y < 3\). How can we eliminate \(t\) from the parametric equations to obtain \(x^2+y^2=9\)?

Can you suggest parametric equations for the same curve, but traced out anticlockwise instead? What if you wanted to trace out the full circle?

The parametric equations of a curve tell us about its shape by showing how \(x\) and \(y\) vary as the parameter varies. The equations may also tell us about the symmetry of the curve.

Just as there can be several Cartesian equations for the same curve, parametric equations are not unique. It may be more convenient to work with some than others, so it is worth exploring different parametrizations of the same curve.