Solution

Each of the following situations, A-D, shows a system of forces acting on a particle of given mass and the initial velocity of the particle. Work out the single extra constant force that can be added to this system, so that the particle would be brought instantaneously to rest at the specified time.

Mass and forces Initial velocity Time when at rest
A
A force of 60 Newtons acting on a 6 kg particle
velocity of 8 metres per second, perpendicular to the 60 Newton force
\(\quantity{4}{s}\)

There are many ways to solve these problems. We’ll approach the first couple of examples using different mechanical principles and different notation. Both approaches could be used for all four problems, but a particular example may tempt you to choose one approach rather than another.

Without any extra force, this \(\quantity{6}{kg}\) particle is moving with velocity \(\quantity{8}{m\,s^{-1}}\) and accelerating perpendicular to this, due to the \(\quantity{60}{N}\) force.

How will the force of magnitude \(\quantity{F}{N}\) bring the particle to rest?

A force of 60 Newtons acting on a 6 kg particle with the force of magnitude represented

Can we say anything about the approximate values of \(F\) and \(\theta\)? Thinking about this now may help us to check that our final answers are sensible. For example, \(F\sin \theta = 60\), so the magnitude of the force is greater than \(\quantity{60}{N}.\) Is \(\theta\) likely to be greater than or less than \(45^{\circ}\)?

To work out the actual value of \(F\) and the angle \(\theta\), let’s consider perpendicular components along the dotted lines in the diagram.

Firstly, we know that \(F\sin \theta = 60\) because we want to balance out the \(\quantity{60}{N}\) force.

Why do we want to put the particle in equilibrium in this direction?

Secondly, \(F\cos \theta\) needs to provide the acceleration to bring the \(\quantity{6}{kg}\) particle to rest in \(4\) seconds. Using \(v=u+at\) and taking left to be the positive direction, we have \(0=-8+4a.\) So the acceleration we need is \(\quantity{2}{m\,s^{-2}}\) in the opposite direction to the initial velocity. It follows from Newton’s Second Law that \(F\cos \theta=12.\)

We now know the perpendicular components of the force, \(F\cos \theta\) and \(F\sin \theta\), so we can find \(F\) and \(\theta\). \[F=\sqrt{60^2+12^2}=\sqrt{3744}=61.18...\] so the force has magnitude \(\quantity{61.2}{N}\,\,\,(3\,s.f.)\) and we now need to work out its direction.

A right-angled triangle with side lengths 12, 60 and F with angle theta opposite length 60

As \(\tan \theta =\dfrac{60}{12}=5\), we have \(\theta=\arctan{5}=78.69...\) so \(\theta=79^{\circ}\) to the nearest degree.

Does this combination of magnitude and direction seem reasonable?

Describe how the particle behaves over time if this extra force is applied, assuming all the given forces acting on the particle remain unchanged. Compare this with how the particle would have behaved if the extra force had not been applied.

With the extra force added, the resultant force on the particle is acting in the opposite direction to the initial velocity. Therefore the particle will be restricted to moving in a straight line, reversing direction after \(4\) seconds. Without this force, the particle would have maintained the \(\quantity{8}{m\,s^{-1}}\) component of its initial velocity, but also accelerated in the direction of the \(\quantity{60}{N}\) force at a rate of \(\quantity{10}{m\,s^{-2}}\), so the component of velocity in this direction after time \(t\) seconds would have been \(\quantity{10t}{m\,s^{-1}}.\) Try to sketch this path of the particle.

The GeoGebra file above shows the two possible paths of the particle.

Mass and forces Initial velocity Time when at rest
B
A force of 30 Newtons acting on a 5 kg particle
Velocity of 6 metres per second, 120 degrees to the 30 Newton force
\(\quantity{2}{s}\)

For this example we’ll use two approaches.

We’ll use unit vectors \(\mathbf{i}\) and \(\mathbf{j}\) where the directions of \(\mathbf{i}\) and \(\mathbf{j}\) are shown in this diagram.

As we know the mass and initial velocity of the particle, we know its initial momentum. We want to find the force that over \(\quantity{2}{s}\) will provide an impulse which brings the particle to rest.

A force of 30 Newtons acting on a 5 kg particle with a velocity of 6 metres per second, 120 degrees to the 30 Newton force

In terms of \(\mathbf{i}\) and \(\mathbf{j}\), the initial velocity is \(\quantity{(6\cos 30^{\circ}\mathbf{i}+6\sin 30^{\circ}\mathbf{j})}{m\,s^{-1}}.\) This is \(\quantity{\left(6\times\tfrac{\sqrt{3}}{2}\mathbf{i}+6\times\tfrac{1}{2}\mathbf{j}\right)}{m\,s^{-1}}\), which simplifies to \(\quantity{3(\sqrt{3}\mathbf{i}+\mathbf{j})}{m\,s^{-1}}.\)

Therefore the initial momentum is \(\quantity{15\left(\sqrt{3}\mathbf{i}+\mathbf{j}\right)}{Ns}.\)

A right-angled triangle with side lengths of 6, (6x0.5) and (6x root 3 divided by 2). Also an angle these opposite side length of (6x0.5)

The total impulse, \(\mathbf{I}\), (due to forces acting for \(\quantity{2}{s}\)) needs to satisfy \(15\left(\sqrt{3}\mathbf{i}+\mathbf{j}\right)+\mathbf{I}=\mathbf{0}.\)

How do the forces acting on the particle provide this impulse?

The \(\quantity{-30\mathbf{j}}{N}\) force contributes an impulse in the direction we want, but this is likely to be too large for the stopping time required. We also need impulse in the direction of \(-\mathbf{i}\) so we need a further force to act on the particle. We’ll write this extra force as \(\quantity{(b\mathbf{i}+c\mathbf{j})}{N}\) where we expect \(b\) to be negative and \(c\) to be positive.

Therefore \(15\left(\sqrt{3}\mathbf{i}+\mathbf{j}\right) + 2(-30\mathbf{j} + b\mathbf{i}+c\mathbf{j})=\mathbf{0}\),

which gives us two equations to solve: \(2b=-15\sqrt{3}\) and \(2(c-30)=-15.\)

Solving these gives us the required force of \(\quantity{(-13.0\mathbf{i}+22.5\mathbf{j})}{N} \,\,\,\text{(3 s.f.)}.\) As expected, \(b\) is negative and \(c\) is positive.

The acceleration needed to bring this particle to instantaneous rest is \(\quantity{3}{m\,s^{-2}}\) in the opposite direction to the initial velocity. This acceleration is provided by a force of magnitude \(\quantity{15}{N}.\)

Velocity of 6 metres per second, 120 degrees to the 30 Newton force

If there were no other forces acting on the particle, the \(\quantity{15}{N}\) force would be the extra force we’d need. But we need to work out what extra force we can apply so that the \(\quantity{15}{N}\) force is the resultant of the \(\quantity{30}{N}\) force and this extra force.

Using a vector triangle, as shown, we can work out the magnitude \(F\) and direction \(\theta\) of the extra force.

A force of 30 Newtons acting on a 5 kg particle with a velocity of 3 metres per second and a right angled triangle is drawn connecting the velocity and force and this hypotenuse length is FN

The angle between the \(\quantity{15}{N}\) force and the \(\quantity{30}{N}\) force is \(60^{\circ}\) and \(\cos 60^{\circ}=\tfrac{15}{30}\), so the vector triangle shown is right-angled, with \(\theta=30^{\circ}\) and \(F^2=675.\) It follows that the extra force we need to apply has magnitude \(\quantity{15\sqrt{3}}{N}\) and is directed at \(30^{\circ}\) to the upward dotted line, which means it is perpendicular to the direction of the initial velocity.

If the triangle had not been right-angled, how could we have found \(F\) and \(\theta\)?

Compare these approaches with each other and our approach to the first example.

  • How did using momentum and impulse compare with using acceleration?

  • How did using a triangle of forces compare with using components?

  • How did using \(\mathbf{i}\) and \(\mathbf{j}\) affect the type of calculations we had to do? Note that we chose to define \(\mathbf{i}\) and \(\mathbf{j}\) in the directions given, but we could have chosen different directions for these. For example, we could have chosen \(\mathbf{i}\) to be in the direction of the initial velocity.

Describe how the particle behaves over time if this extra force is applied, assuming all the given forces acting on the particle remain unchanged. Compare this with how the particle would have behaved if the extra force had not been applied.

With the extra force in place the impulse is directed in the opposite direction to the initial momentum, so the particle will move in a straight line, coming to rest after \(2\) seconds as it reverses direction along this line. Without this extra force, the component of momentum in the direction of \(\mathbf{i}\) would have been maintained, but the particle would have received an impulse in the \(-\mathbf{j}\) direction, first bringing the momentum in this direction to zero, but after this the velocity and momentum would have had components in the positive \(\mathbf{i}\) and negative \(\mathbf{j}\) directions.

The GeoGebra file above shows the two possible paths of the particle.

Before tackling the next two examples, it would be worth considering how they are similar to or different from the first two and each other. How will this affect

  • the approach you take?

  • your choice of notation?

Mass and forces Initial velocity Time when at rest
C
A force of 12 Newtons acting on a 3kg particle to the right and a force of 14 Newtons acting to the left at 60 degrees to the line of action of the 12 Newton force
velocity of 5 metres per second, acting in the opposite direction to the 12 Newton force
\(\quantity{3}{s}\)

Why will the extra force shown bring this particle to rest in \(\quantity{3}{s}\)?

A force of 12 Newtons acting on a 3kg particle to the right and a force of 14 Newtons acting to the left at 60 degrees to the line of action of the 12 Newton force. Also a force of 7 root 3 Newtons acting straight downwards. There is also a velocity of 5 metres per second, acting in the opposite direction to the 12 Newton force

Describe how the particle behaves over time if this extra force is applied, assuming all the given forces acting on the particle remain unchanged. Compare this with how the particle would have behaved if the extra force had not been applied.

If the extra force is applied, the particle will continue to move in the direction of its initial velocity, travelling in a straight line but reversing direction after \(5\) seconds. Without this force, the component of the particle’s velocity parallel to its initial velocity would have decreased to zero and then reversed direction, whereas the component of velocity perpendicular to this would have continued to increase from zero, so at time \(\quantity{3}{s}\) the particle would have been moving perpendicular to its initial velocity. Can you sketch the two paths of the particle?

Mass and forces Initial velocity Time when at rest
D
Three forces acting on a 4kg particle
velocity of 8 metres per second
\(\quantity{2}{s}\)

Why will the extra force shown bring this particle to rest in \(\quantity{2}{s}\)?

Four forces acting on a 4kg particle

Describe how the particle behaves over time if this extra force is applied, assuming all the given forces acting on the particle remain unchanged. Compare this with how the particle would have behaved if the extra force had not been applied.

If the extra force is applied, the particle will move in a straight line, reversing direction after \(2\) seconds. If the extra force had not been applied, the particle would have continued to move along the same straight line, but as it would be in equilibrium, it would have maintained its speed of \(\quantity{8}{m\,s^{-1}}.\)