Processing math: 100%

  1. Evaluate the following. Can you do this without calculating each factor separately?

    1. (log39)(log981)

    2. (log381)(log819)

Using the generalised version of the result in the warm-up,

  1. (log39)(log981)=log381=4

  2. (log381)(log819)=log39=2.

  1. Write the following as a single logarithm. What conditions must x and y satisfy?

    1. (log105)(log5x)

    2. (log10x)(logxy)(logy3)

Using the same idea as in question 1, (a) (log105)(log5x)=log10x.

For part (b), one approach is

(log10x)(logxy)(logy3)=(log10y)(logy3)=log103

Since x and y both occur as bases of logarithms in these expressions, x and y must both be positive, but can’t be 1.

  1. Simplify the following. What conditions must x and y satisfy?

    1. (logxy)(logy10)(log8x)

    2. (logxy)(log8x)(logy8)

  1. (logxy)(logy10)(log8x)=(logx10)(log8x)=(log8x)(logx10)=log810.

  2. (logxy)(log8x)(logy8)=(log8x)(logxy)(logy8)=(log8y)(logy8)=log88=1.

Again, since x and y both occur as bases of logarithms in these expressions, x and y must both be positive, but can’t be 1.

  1. The value of log23 is approximately 1.6. Can you use this to approximate log427? What about log827?

If we start by using the law for manipulating logs of powers, we get log427=3log43.

From the definition of logarithms, we know that log43 is smaller than log23, so we can expect the answer to be less than 4.8. In fact, we can say more than this, because log43<1<log23, so we should expect the answer to be less than 3.

From the warm-up we know that log43=12log23. Therefore log427=3(log42)(log23)3×12×1.6=2.4.

We know that log827 will be smaller than log427. By manipulating powers and changing the base, we get log827=3(log82)(log23)=log231.6.

Note that from the second part we have log2333=log23. In general, logakbk=logab for any positive a, b with a1 and any power k. How could you prove this?

  1. Evaluate

    1. log25log225

    2. log105log103

  1. log25log225=log25(log25)(log525)=12

  2. log105log103=(log103)(log35)log103=log35

Alternatively, we could use the fraction form of the general result in the warm-up.

  1. Given that logxy=4 and logy2=9, evaluate

    1. (logx2)(logyx)

    2. logx2logyx

  1. (logx2)(logyx)=(logyx)(logx2)=logy2=9.

  2. Using ideas from question 5, or the two forms for changing base given in the warm-up, the numerator can be rewritten as (logxy)(logy2) and the denominator as logxxlogxy.

Therefore logx2logyx=(logxy)(logy2)logxxlogxy=(logxy)2logy2=16×9=144
  1. What is (logab3)(logba3)?

Using laws for manipulating logs of powers, (logab3)(logba3)=9(logab)(logba)=9logaa=9.

  1. What is the relationship between logab and logba?

In questions 3 and 7 we had something of the form (logab)(logba)=logaa, so (logab)(logba)=1, or equivalently logab=1logba. Is there any danger of dividing by 0 here?

  1. Solve logx7=log7x.

Using the relationship in question 8, solving logx7=log7x is equivalent to solving (log7x)2=1. Therefore we need to solve log7x=1 and log7x=1, which give us x=7 and x=17 as solutions.